Domain Name Disputes – No Uniformity

It is amazing to me how non-uniform the decisions issued under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution (UDRP) procedure can be. I have handled many of these disputes, with a substantial degree of success, but the lack of uniform, predictable decisions still concerns me. ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assignment of Names and Numbers) has received numerous complaints regarding the lack of fairness in the process, but incremental changes (if any) have been the result.

I have not seen any outright bias or conflict of interest in the dispute resolution process, at least yet, and I think the panelists appointed to determine disputes over ownership of domain names try to do their best. They are certainly required to be impartial. (See UDRP Rule 7 – “A Panelist shall be impartial and independent and shall have, before accepting appointment, disclosed to the Provider any circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubt as to the Panelist's impartiality or independence.”) In all fairness to ICANN, with a global dispute resolution process such as this one, there will always be a certain degree of non-uniformity in the process. It certainly exists in the courts, so we should not hold WIPO or NAF (the two non-Asian arbitration organizations that handle UDRP disputes) to a different standard. However, the amount of contradictory opinions involving almost identical domain names and arguments can be shocking. The unfairness of the situation is enhanced by the absence of an effective appeal process.

Many suggestions to make fundamental changes to, or eliminate altogether, ICAAN have been advocated, and each one would have a massive impact on the ways that disputed ownership of domain names are determined. These include letting the US Government perform ICANN's tasks directly, assigning ICANN's tasks − including administration of the UDRP − to the International Telecommunication Union, and creating a new non-profit organization to take over for ICANN. I think I would rather have to deal with the U.S. government than the ITU, but that's not a ringing endorsement of either option. A new non-profit entity would be faced with the same challenges regarding domain name dispute resolution as ICANN. The problem lies with a lack of clear direction, akin to stare decisis in the common law, establishing concrete substantive principles under the UDRP, coupled with the absence of an effective appellate process. To contact experienced legal professionals please visit our website.

Murray Camp

(214) 979-0100

mcamp@tiptonjoneslaw.com

Welcome

Welcome to the revised Tipton Jones website and to our blog. We hope you’ll check out our website and learn a bit about us and our practice. We also hope you’ll stop by our blog from time to time to see what’s on our collective mind. Various of our attorneys will post here, on topics ranging from changes in the law and recent cases to comments on current events and how the law can affect your life. We might even venture an opinion or two about the Cowboys. It’s our goal to enlighten, help, educate, and maybe – just maybe – to entertain. So please feel free to come back. Thank you.

Mike Farris

(214) 979-0100

mfarris@tiptonjoneslaw.com

WHY DO I NEED A WILL?

Everyone should have a will. Having a Last Will and Testament is especially important for people with dependent children, as the will designates guardianship of minors, and the elderly.

In the absence of a will, a decedent’s property is distributed according to state law provisions, without regard to your wishes or your heirs' needs. In this case, personal wishes, even if they are written down, will most likely not be followed.

Even if you have a revocable living trust, in which you can place assets to be distributed outside of probate, it is still a good idea to have a will. In addition to letting you name a guardian for your children, having a will ensures that any assets you intended to put into trust are put there, even if you fail to title some of them to the trust before your death. Any assets that are not titled in the name of the trust will be subject to probate.

A will may be updated at any time, and should be reviewed regularly. If your estate planning documents have not been reviewed in the past five years, or if significant changes have taken place since they were prepared, it is important to reassess them to make sure they suit your current position and desires. In addition, laws on the structuring of estate planning documents periodically change.

If you do not have a will, or if you would like to revisit your estate planning, feel free to contact an experienced Texas Lawyer at Tipton Jones to see how we can help you prepare for the future.

Paul Tipton

(214)890-0991

ptipton@tiptonjonesllp.com

The Dallas, Texas, branch of Tipton Jones, proudly serves clients in Dallas County, Collin County, Denton County, and the North Texas area, including the cities of McKinney, Plano, Frisco, Allen, Richardson, Highland Park, University Park, Carrollton, Garland, Coppell, South Lake, Rockwall, Mesquite, Irving, Rowlett, Denton, Fort Worth, Arlington, Lewisville, and Grand Prairie, Texas.

The Houston, Texas, branch of Tipton Jones, proudly serves clients in Harris County, Fort Bend County, Montgomery County, and Brazoria County and the Southeast Texas area, including the cities of Alief, Barker, Baytown, Bellaire, Channelview, Crosby, Cypress, Deer Park, Galena Park, Highlands, Hockley, Houston, Huffman, Hufsmith, Humble, Katy, La Porte, North Houston, Pasadena, Seabrook, South Houston, Spring, Tomball, and Webster.